Which option explicitly proposes an in-person meeting to discuss the issue?

• A. What else can you tell me about this?
• B. This is upsetting to me. How soon can we meet to discuss this in person?
• C. I apologize that this happened. What would you like to see done at this point so we can correct this for you?
• D. Would it help you if I did some fact finding, and then we got back together to discuss some possible actions that could take care of this for you?

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is recognizing when a statement explicitly proposes an in-person meeting to discuss an issue. The best choice directly asks to meet in person and sets a sense of urgency: “This is upsetting to me. How soon can we meet to discuss this in person?” The explicit mention of meeting in person makes the intent crystal clear and shows a direct, concrete step toward resolving the matter.

The other statements don’t commit to an in-person discussion. One asks for more information, which keeps the conversation at information gathering rather than scheduling a discussion. Another focuses on apology and asking what should be done next without arranging a meeting. The last option suggests doing some fact-finding first and then “getting back together” to discuss actions, but it doesn’t explicitly specify the meeting in person and implies a delay or a different structure for the next discussion.